简历Creating_your_academic_cv_handout_百度文库
两大类热门资源免费畅读
续费一年阅读会员，立省24元！
简历Creating_your_academic_cv_handout
上传于||暂无简介
阅读已结束，如果下载本文需要使用
想免费下载本文？
下载文档到电脑，查找使用更方便
还剩26页未读，继续阅读
你可能喜欢From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For a broader coverage related to this topic, see .
Academic publishing is the subfield of
which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in
article, book or
form. The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called "". Most scientific and scholarly journals, and many academic and scholarly books, though not all, are based on some form of
or editorial refereeing to qualify texts for publication. Peer review quality and selectivity standards vary greatly from journal to journal, publisher to publisher, and field to field.
Most established
have their own journals and other outlets for publication, although many academic journals are somewhat , and publish work from several distinct fields or subfields. There is also a tendency for existing journals to divide into specialized sections as the field itself becomes more specialized. Along with the variation in review and publication procedures, the kinds of publications that are accepted as contributions to knowledge or research differ greatly among fields and subfields.
Academic publishing is undergoing major changes, as it makes the transition from the print to the electronic format. Business models are different in the electronic environment. Since the early 1990s, licensing of electronic resources, particularly journals, has been very common. Currently, an important trend, particularly with respect to journals in the sciences, is
via the Internet. In
a journal article is made available free for all on the web by the publisher at the time of publication. It is typically made possible after the
hundreds or thousands of dollars in , thereby shifting the costs from the reader to the researcher or their funder. The Internet has facilitated open access , in which authors themselves make a copy of their published articles available free for all on the web.
One of the earliest
is the , created in the 17th century. At that time, the act of publishing academic inquiry was controversial, and widely ridiculed. It was not at all unusual for a new discovery to be announced as an , reserving priority for the discoverer, but indecipherable for anyone not in on the secret: both
used this approach. However, this method did not work well. , a sociologist, found that 92% of cases of simultaneous discovery in the 17th century ended in dispute. The number of disputes dropped to 72% in the 18th century, 59% by the latter half of the 19th century, and 33% by the first half of the 20th century. The decline in contested claims for
in research discoveries can be credited to the increasing acceptance of the publication of papers in modern academic journals, with estimates suggesting that around 50 million journal articles have been published since the first appearance of the Philosophical Transactions.
was steadfast in its not yet popular belief that science could only move forward through a transparent and open exchange of ideas backed by experimental evidence.
(later spelled Journal des savants), established by , was the earliest academic journal published in Europe. Its content included obituaries of famous men, church history, and legal reports. The first issue appeared as a twelve-page
on Monday, 5 January 1665. This was shortly before the first appearance of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, on 6 March 1665.
In the 1960s and 1970s, commercial publishers began to selectively acquire "top-quality" journals which were previously published by nonprofit academic societies. Due to the
demand for these journals, the commercial publishers lost little of the market when they raised the prices significantly. Although there are over 2,000 publishers, five for-profit companies (, , , , and ) account for 50% of articles published. Available data indicate that these companies have high , especially compared to the smaller publishers which likely operate with low margins. These factors have contributed to the "" - from , the number of serials purchased has increased an average of 1.9% per year while total expenditures on serials has increased 7.6% per year.
Unlike most industries, in academic publishing the two most important inputs are provided "virtually free of charge". These are the articles and the peer review process. Publishers argue that they add value to the publishing process through support to the peer review group, including stipends, as well as through typesetting, printing, and web publishing. Investment analysts, however, have been skeptical of the value added by for-profit publishers, as exemplified by a 2005 Deutsche Bank analysis which stated that "we believe the publisher adds relatively little value to the publishing process... We are simply observing that if the process really were as complex, costly and value-added as the publishers protest that it is, 40% margins wouldn't be available."
Main article:
A crisis in academic publishing is "widely perceived"; the apparent crisis has to do with the combined pressure of budget cuts at universities and increased costs for journals (the ). The university budget cuts have reduced library budgets and reduced subsidies to university-affiliated publishers. The humanities have been particularly affected by the pressure on university publishers, which are less able to publish
when libraries can't afford to purchase them. For example, the ARL found that in "1986, libraries spent 44% of their budgets on books compared with 56% twelve years later, the ratio had skewed to 28% and 72%." Meanwhile, monographs are increasingly expected for tenure in the humanities. The Modern Language Association has expressed hope that
will solve the issue.
In 2009 and 2010, surveys and reports found that libraries faced continuing budget cuts, with one survey in 2009 finding that one-third of libraries had their budgets cut by 5% or more.
Main article:
Several models are being investigated such as open publication models or adding community-oriented features. It is also considered that "Online scientific interaction outside the traditional journal space is becoming more and more important to academic communication". In addition, experts have suggested measures to make the publication process more efficient in disseminating new and important findings by evaluating the worthiness of publication on the basis of the significance and novelty of the research finding.
In academic publishing, a paper is an academic work that is usually published in an . It contains original research results or reviews existing results. Such a paper, also called an article, will only be considered valid if it undergoes a process of
by one or more referees (who are academics in the same field) who check that the content of the paper is suitable for publication in the journal. A paper may undergo a series of reviews, revisions and re-submissions before finally being accepted or rejected for publication. This process typically takes several months. Next there is often a delay of many months (or in some subjects, over a year) before an accepted manuscript appears. This is particularly true for the most popular journals where the number of accepted articles often outnumbers the space for printing. Due to this, many academics
a '' copy of their paper for free download from their personal or institutional website.
Some journals, particularly newer ones, are now published in . Paper journals are now generally made available in electronic form as well, both to individual subscribers, and to libraries. Almost always these electronic versions are available to subscribers immediately upon publication of the paper version, sometimes they are also made available to non-subscribers, either immediately (by ) or after an
of anywhere from two to twenty-four months or more, in order to protect against loss of subscriptions. Journals having this delayed availability are sometimes called . Ellison has reported that in economics the dramatic increase in opportunities to publish results online has led to a decline in the use of peer reviewed articles.
An academic paper typically belongs to some particular category such as:
is the generic term for a journal of
scholarship in the , often operating by rules radically different from those for most other academic journals.
Main article:
Peer review is a central concept for most other scholars in a field must find a work sufficiently high in quality for it to merit publication. A secondary benefit of the process is an indirect guard against , since reviewers are usually familiar with the sources consulted by the author(s). The origins of routine peer review for submissions dates to 1752 when the Royal Society of London took over official responsibility for Philosophical Transactions. However, there were some earlier examples.
While journal editors largely agree the system is essential to quality control in terms of rejecting poor quality work, there have been examples of important results that are turned down by one journal before being taken to others. Rena Steinzor wrote:
Perhaps the most widely recognized failing of peer review is its inability to ensure the identification of high-quality work. The list of important scientific papers that were initially rejected by peer-reviewed journals goes back at least as far as the editor of Philosophical Transaction's 1796 rejection of 's report of the first
"Confirmatory bias" is the unconscious tendency to accept reports which support the reviewer's views and to downplay those which do not. Experimental studies show the problem exists in peer reviewing.
The process of academic publishing, which begins when authors submit a
to a publisher, is divided into two distinct phases: peer review and production.
The process of peer review is organized by the journal editor and is complete when the content of the article, together with any associated images or figures, are accepted for publication. The peer review process is increasingly managed online, through the use of proprietary systems, commercial software packages, or open source and free software. A manuscript undergoes one or m after each round, the author(s) of the article modify their submission in line with the reviewers' this process is repeated until the editor is satisfied and the work is accepted.
The production process, controlled by a production editor or publisher, then takes an article through , , inclusion in a specific issue of a journal, and then printing and online publication. Academic copy editing seeks to ensure that an article conforms to the journal's , that all of the referencing and labelling is correct, and that the text is co often this work involves substantive editing and negotiating with the authors. Because the work of academic copy editors can overlap with that of , editors employed by journal publishers often refer to themselves as “manuscript editors”. Typesetting deals with the appearance of the article — layouts, fonts, headings etc., both for print and online publication. Historically, these activities were all carried out in-house in a publisher, but increasingly are subject to . The majority of typesetting is probably now done in India and China, and copy editing is frequently done by local freelancers, or by staff at the typesetters in India or China. Even printing and distribution are now tending to move overseas to lower-cost areas of the world, such as Singapore.[]
In much of the 20th century, such articles were photographed for printing into
and journals, and this stage were known as
copy. With modern digital submission in formats such as , this photographing step is no longer necessary, though the term is still sometimes used.
will review and correct proofs at one or more stages in the production process. The proof correction cycle has historically been labour-intensive as handwritten comments by authors and editors are manually transcribed by a
onto a clean version of the proof. In the early 21st century, this process was streamlined by the introduction of e-annotations in , , and other programs, but it still remained a time-consuming and error-prone process. The full automation of the proof correction cycles has only become possible with the onset of
platforms, such as , , and various others, where a remote service oversees the
interactions of multiple authors and exposes them as explicit, actionable historic events.
Main article:
Academic authors cite sources they have used, in order to support their assertions and arguments and to help readers find more information on the subject. It also gives credit to authors whose work they use and helps avoid .
Each scholarly journal uses a specific format for citations (also known as references). Among the most common formats used in research papers are the , , and
The American Psychological Association (APA) style is often used in the . The Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) is used in , , , and . The CMS style uses footnotes at the bottom of page to help readers locate the sources. The
style is widely used in the .
Main article:
Scientific, technical, and medical (STM) literature is a large industry which generated $23.5 $9.4 billion of that was specifically from the publication of English language scholarly journals. Most
is initially published in
and considered to be a . , for minor research results and engineering and design work (including computer software) round out the primary literature.
in the sciences include articles in
(which provide a synthesis of research articles on a topic to highlight advances and new lines of research), and
for large projects, broad arguments, or compilations of articles.
might include
and similar works intended for broad public consumption or academic libraries.
A partial exception to scientific publication practices is in many fields of applied science, particularly that of U.S.
research. An equally prestigious site of publication within U.S. computer science are some . Reasons for this departure include a large number of such conferences, the quick pace of research progress, and computer science
support for the distribution and archiving of conference .
Publishing in the
is very different in different fields. Some fields, like economics, may have very "hard" or highly quantitative standards for publication, much like the natural sciences. Others, like anthropology or sociology, emphasize
and reporting on first-hand observation as well as quantitative work. Some social science fields, such as
or , have significant shared interests with professions like
and , and scholars in these fields often also publish in .
Publishing in the
is in principle similar to publishing else a range of journals, from general to extremely specialized, are available, and
issue many new humanities books every year. The arrival of online publishing opportunities has radically transformed the economics of the field and the shape of the future is controversial. Unlike science, where timeliness is critically important, humanities publications often take years to write and years more to publish. Unlike the sciences, research is most often an individual process and is seldom supported by large grants. Journals rarely make profits and are typically run by university departments.
The following describes the situation in the United States. In many fields, such as literature and history, several published articles are typically required for a first
job, and a published or forthcoming book is now often required before tenure. Some critics complain that this de facto system has emerged without thought they claim that the predictable result is the publication of much shoddy work, as well as unreasonable demands on the already limited research time of young scholars. To make matters worse, the circulation of many humanities journals in the 1990s declined to almost untenable levels, as many libraries cancelled subscriptions, leaving fewer and fewer peer-reviewed out and many humanities professors' first books sell only a few hundred copies, which often does not pay for the cost of their printing. Some scholars have called for a
of a few thousand dollars to be associated with each
or new tenure-track hire, in order to alleviate the financial pressure on journals.
Main article:
An alternative to the subscription model of journal publishing is the open access journal model, which typically involves a
being paid by the author. Prestige journals typically charge several thousand dollars. Oxford University Press, with over 300 journals, has fees ranging from ?, with discounts of 50% to 100% to authors from developing countries. Wiley Blackwell has 700 journals available, and they charge a flat $US3000 open access fee. Springer, with over 2600 journals, charges US$3000 or EUR 2200 (excluding VAT).
The online distribution of individual articles and academic journals then takes place without charge to readers and libraries. Most
remove all the financial, technical, and legal
that limit access to academic materials to paying customers. The
are prominent examples of this model.
Open access has been criticized on quality grounds, as the desire to maximize publishing fees could cause some journals to relax the standard of peer review. It may be criticized on financial grounds as well, because the necessary publication fees have proven to be higher than originally expected. Open access advocates generally reply that because open access is as much based on peer reviewing as traditional publishing, the quality should be the same (recognizing that both traditional and open access journals have a range of quality). It has also been argued that good science done by academic institutions who cannot afford to pay for open access might not get published at all, but most open access journals permit the waiver of the fee for financial hardship or authors in . In any case, all authors have the option of
their articles in their
in order to make them , whether or not they publish them in a journal.
If they publish in a , authors pay a subscription journal a publication fee to make their individual article open access. The other articles in such hybrid journals are either made available after a delay, or remain available only by subscription. Most traditional publishers (including , , and ) have already introduced such a hybrid option, and more are following. Proponents of open access suggest that such moves by corporate publishers illustrate that open access, or a mix of open access and traditional publishing, can be financially viable, and evidence to that effect is emerging[]. The fraction of the authors of a hybrid open access journal that make use of its open access option can however be small. It also remains unclear whether this is practical in fields outside the sciences, where there is much less availability of outside funding. In 2006, several , including the
and several divisions of the
in the UK announced the availability of extra funding to their grantees for such
publication fees.
In recent decades there has been a growth in academic publishing in
as they become more advanced in science and technology. Although the large majority of scientific output and academic documents are produced in developed countries, the rate of growth in these countries has stabilized and is much smaller than the growth rate in some of the developing countries. The fastest scientific output growth rate over the last two decades has been in the Middle East and Asia with Iran leading with an 11-fold increase followed by the Republic of Korea, Turkey, Cyprus, China, and Oman. In comparison, the only
countries in top 20 ranking with fastest performance improvement are,
which stands at tenth and
at 13th globally.
By 2004, it was noted that the output of scientific papers originating from the
had a larger share of the world's total from 36.6 to 39.3 percent and from 32.8 to 37.5 per cent of the "top one per cent of highly cited scientific papers". However, the United States' output dropped 52.3 to 49.4 per cent of the world's total, and its portion of the top one percent dropped from 65.6 to 62.8 per cent.
Iran, China, , , and
were the only developing countries among the 31 nations that produced 97.5% of the most cited scientific articles in a study published in 2004. The remaining 162 countries contributed less than 2.5%. The
in a 2011 report stated that in share of English scientific research papers the United States was first followed by China, the UK, Germany, Japan, France, and Canada. The report predicted that China would overtake the United States some time before 2020, possibly as early as 2013. China's scientific impact, as measured by other scientists citing the published papers the next year, is smaller although also increasing.
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004) . Nature Web Focus.
Jeffery, Keith G. (2006) . ERCIM News 64. January 2006
Jinha, A. E. (2010).
(PDF). Learned Publishing 23 (3): 258–263. :.
from the original on .
, Dibner Library of the Smithsonian Institution
Brown, 1972, p. 368
Hallam, 1842, p. 406.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Vol. 1, Issue 1, is dated March 6, 1665. See also
. phys.org.
McGuigan GS, Russell RD. (2008). . E-JASL: The Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship. ICAAP.
Association of Research Libraries, . As cited in McGuigan & Russell 2008.
Sample, Ian (24 April 2012). . The Guardian.
(2007). . IEEE Intelligent Systems 22 (5). :.
(2008). . IEEE Intelligent Systems 23 (1): 2–3. :.
J. Scott Armstrong (1997).
(PDF). Energy & Environment 3: 63–84. :.
Glenn Ellison, "Is Peer Review in Decline?" Economic Inquiry (July
pp 635–657, DOI: 10.1111/j.10.00261.x
Concept Paper:
(PDF download). Hanover Grants. 2011. Funders often ask for brief 1- to 5-page concept papers (also called “white papers” in the government contracting sector) prior to submission of a full proposal.
. The Gerber Foundation. 2012.
David A. Kronick, "Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism." JAMA ( pp: .
. . .  .
Mahoney, Michael J. "Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system." Cognitive therapy and research ( pp: 161-175.
Iverson, Cheryl (2004).
(PDF). Science Editor 27 (2): 39–41 2013.
de Jager, Marije. Journal copy-editing in a non-anglophone environment. In: Matarese, Valerie (ed) (2013). Supporting Research Writing: Roles and challenges in multilingual settings. Oxford: Chandos. pp. 157–171.  .
Ware, Mark and Michael Wabe. (2012)
The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing. Outsell and the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical PublishersNovember 2012.
Patterson, David (University of California, Berkeley); Snyder, L Ullma,Jeffrey (August 1999).
(Free PDF download). Computing Research News. Computing Research Association.
Grudin, Jonathan (April 2–7, 2005). . CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, Oregon: ACM Press. pp. .
Joel Best, "Following the Money Across the Landscape of Sociology Journals." The American Sociologist (2015): 1-16.
Cathy Davidson, "The futures of scholarly publishing." Journal of Scholarly Publishing (2015).
Toby Miller, Blow Up the Humanities (2012)
For typical policies see
MacKenzie, Debora (). . Science in Society. New Scientist (online magazine).
S. M. J. Mortazavi, and Z. Hashemi (June 2011). . Indian Journal of Science and Technology 4 (6): 716–716.
David Dickson (). . SciDev.Net.
, Alok Jha, Monday 28 March 2011, The Guardian,
Belcher, Wendy Laura. “Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks: A Guide to Academic Publishing Success.”
Best, Joel. "Following the Money Across the Landscape of Sociology Journals." The American Sociologist (2015): 1-16.
Brienza, Casey. "Opening the wrong gate? The academic spring and scholarly publishing in the humanities and social sciences." Publishing research quarterly 28.3 (2012): 159-171.
Culler, Jonathan, and Kevin Lamb. Just being difficult? : academic writing in the public arena Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 2003.
Germano, William. Getting It Published, 2nd Edition: A Guide for Scholars and Anyone Else Serious About Serious Books. . Read .
Greco, Albert N. "Academic Libraries and the Economics of Scholarly Publishing in the Twenty-First Century: Portfolio Theory, Product Differentiation, Economic Rent, Perfect Price Discrimination, and the Cost of Prestige." Journal of Scholarly Publishing 47.1 (2015): 1-43.
Nelson, Cary and Stephen Watt. "Scholarly Books" and "Peer Review" in Academic Keywords: A Devil's Dictionary for Higher Education. .
Tenopir, Carol and Donald King. "Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Librarians and Publishers. SLA, 2000. .
Wellington, J. J. Getting published : a guide for lecturers and researcher (RoutledgeFalmer, 2003).
Yang, Rui. "Scholarly publishing, knowledge mobility and internationalization of Chinese universities." in Tara Fenwick and Lesley Farrell, eds. Knowledge mobilization and educational research: Politics, languages and responsibilities (2012): 185-167.
: Hidden categories: